Thursday, November 27, 2014

EdTech for SD Teachers Podcast - Episode 11: Thankful for Project-Based Learning

This week, I continue a previous podcast on project-based learning technologies and discuss the 9 elements of project-based learning and give some example projects that might work for different subject areas.  Here are the nine elements of project based learning:

Anchor 
• Task 
• Directions 
• Student choices 
• Student inquiry 
• Collaboration and teamwork 
• Teacher coaching and feedback 
• Student reflection 
• Public presentation 

More information in my book - Educational Technology for Teachers - including how to create a project-based learning experience and how to use technology in project-based learning.

Tuesday, November 25, 2014

Why Do Distance Learning?

In a previous post, I discussed which is better for learning, distance or face to face? The conclusion was that students learn as much in a distance course as they do in a face to face course. So if students learn as much in a face-to-face class as they do in a distance learning class, then what are the reasons for creating and providing distance learning? This post is an excerpt from my book, Educational Technology for Teachers.

Access is one of the main reasons that educational institutions offer distance learning options. Through distance learning, students can take classes that might not otherwise be available to them. An excellent example is the Center for Statewide E-Learning which is located on the campus of Northern State University in Aberdeen, South Dakota. In this center, distance teachers provide quality distance instruction to South Dakota high school students. The subjects covered include advanced language arts, math, chemistry, physics, and Spanish — subjects that would otherwise be unavailable to many rural students in South Dakota due to a lack of local qualified teachers in small communities, or the low numbers of students who would take the class (Gosmire & Vondruska, 2001). 


As is the case with the Center for Statewide E-Learning, the desire for increased access to educational opportunities has also led universities around the world to provide more and more online course offerings as they seek more funding from increased enrollment. Some universities offer entire programs completely online, reaching an ever-expanding population of students. The new educational fad of offering Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) was also designed to increase access to more and more students, albeit within courses that are inferior in terms of instructor-to-student interaction and effective instruction (see Gardner & Young, 2013; Kolowich, 2013a, 2013b; Pappano, 2012). Even prestigious universities such as the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Yale University offer free and open course materials online so that anyone can access, learn from and use these materials (“MIT open courseware,” 2014, “Open Yale Courses,” 2011). 

Other reasons that students need distance learning opportunities may include illness, medical issues or home schooling. As online learning technologies and options become more common, more and more students are demanding flexible learning options like those that can be supported from a distance (Simonson, Smaldino, Albright, & Zvacek, 2011). 

Have you taught from a distance? Why do your students need distance learning?

References:

Gardner, L., & Young, J. R. (2013, March 14). California’s move toward MOOCs sends shock waves, but key questions remain unanswered. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/A-Bold-Move-Toward-MOOCs-Sends/137903/?cid=at&utm_source=at&utm_medium=en

Gosmire, D., & Vondruska, J. (2001). Distance teaching and learning academy. TechTrends, 45(3), 31–34. doi:10.1007/BF02763554

Kolowich, S. (2013a). The professors behind the MOOC hype. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/The-Professors-Behind-the-MOOC/137905/?cid=at&utm_source=at&utm_medium=en#id=overview

Kolowich, S. (2013b). Why professors at San Jose State won’t use a Harvard professor’s MOOC. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Why-Professors-at-San-Jose/138941/

MIT open courseware. (2014). Retrieved July 1, 2014, from http://ocw.mit.edu/index.htm

Open Yale Courses. (2011). Retrieved July 1, 2014, from http://oyc.yale.edu/

Pappano, L. (2012). Massive open online courses are multiplying at a rapid pace. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/massive-open-online-courses-are-multiplying-at-a-rapid-pace.html

Simonson, M., Smaldino, S. E., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2011). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (5 edition.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.



Thursday, November 20, 2014

Educational Technology for SD Teachers Podcast - Episode 10: Digital Natives and Digital Immigrants

This week, I discuss the concept of digital natives and digital immigrants. My son Jacob joins me briefly to play the part of a digital native.











Here are links to the articles featured in the podcast:

Tuesday, November 18, 2014

Which is better for student learning, Distance or Face-to-Face?

So which form of learning is better for student learning? Distance or face to face? The answer may surprise you. In study after study, researchers have found that there is no significant difference between learning in a face-to-face environment and learning in a distance learning environment. In fact, so many research studies have supported this result, that it has been dubbed the “no significant difference phenomenon (Russell, 2001, 2009).” Russell (2009) has even compiled a list of over 350 no significant difference phenomenon studies that show that students learn the about same amount in a distance learning experience as they do in a face-to-face learning experience. This post is an excerpt from my textbook: Educational Technology for Teachers.

So what’s going on here? Why doesn't the amount that students learn differ between a face-to-face class and the same class delivered from a distance? Educational technology experts suggest that it is not the media or delivery method that makes the difference for learning, instead it is the learning method used that makes the difference (Clark, 1994). In the no significant difference phenomenon studies, the learning methods are the same in the face-to-face and distance classes that are compared – despite the different media or delivery method – therefore, the learning is also the same.

Some more information about the no significant difference phenomenon studies is relevant for K-12 teaching and learning. Most of these studies have compared university level learning experiences and not K-12 online learning. Therefore, the no significant difference phenomenon may not apply as directly to K-12 education. Also, when a study is set up to compare a face-to-face class to an online one, great care is taken to make sure the online course is of a high quality and has all of the necessary learning components. However, not all online courses are set up with this high level of care.

So, a course taught from a distance results in equivalent learning outcomes as the same course taught face-to-face. Is this outcome different from what you expected? If so, comment with your own opinions about the differences between face to face and distance learning. 

References:
Russell, T. L. (2001). The no significant difference phenomenon: A comparative research annotated bibliography on technology for distance education: as reported in 355 research reports, summaries and papers. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.

Russell, T. L. (2009). No significant difference phenomenon. Retrieved August 12, 2009, from http://www.nosignificantdifference.org/

Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21–29.



Thursday, November 13, 2014

Educational Technology for SD Teachers Podcast - Episode 9: At the AECT International Convention

This week, I recap my conference experience at the 2014 AECT International Convention in Jacksonville Florida. It was a fun week and a great experience.

Here are links to more information about the presentations and items featured in the podcast:

http://www.iste.org/standards
http://tinyurl.com/m7gmryj 
Fake David Wiley: https://twitter.com/FakeDavidWiley

Thursday, November 6, 2014

Educational Technology for SD Teachers Podcast - Episode 8: Teachers Share About Their Favorite Social Media Tools: Pinterest and Twitter

This week, just like last week, two teachers discuss their favorite social media tools and how they are used for teaching and learning. This podcast features Brittany Konda who provides a fantastic introduction to Pinterest, and Piper Thorpe, who gives some great uses of Twitter.