Tuesday, March 31, 2015

Teachers Must Understand Technology Affordances to be Effective

When using technology for learning or for designing a project-based learning experience, a teacher needs to understand the affordances of various technological tools and resources. This post is an excerpt from my textbook, Educational Technology for Teachers.


A general definition of affordances is “the […] properties of the thing, primarily those fundamental properties that determine just how the thing could possibly be used (Norman, 2002, p. 9).” To clarify, affordances are the things that a particular tool or technology can do well. For instance, a word processing application allows the user to efficiently write a paper or letter. It offers many features that assist in this process including the possibility to write, edit, check spelling and do many more activities. These are the affordances of a word processing application. A presentation software application has many affordances that allow the user to easily create a visual presentation. These affordances might include functions that allow you to apply a theme, add new slides, insert title and slide text, and save and share a presentation.

High-quality learning experiences will often take advantage of the affordances of whatever technologies are used. The opposite is also true. Low-quality learning experiences often do not take advantage of the affordances of technologies.

So, teachers must understand technology affordances to be effective!

Thursday, March 26, 2015

EdTech for SD Teachers Podcast - Episode 22: Teachers Present their Favorite Miscellaneous Tools and Apps

This week, South Dakota Teachers share their favorite technological tools and apps under the "miscellaneous" category. The teachers also share some examples of how they use these tools and apps for learning activities. Here are the tools and apps discussed in this podcast:





  • Document Cameras
  • The Human Body App
  • My Story App
  • StoryKit
  • StoryMaker



  • Thursday, March 19, 2015

    EdTech for SD Teachers Podcast - Episode 21: Teachers Present their Favorite Quiz Apps and Websites

    This week, South Dakota Teachers share their favorite websites and apps that relate to quizzing. These sites allow teachers to prepare for or implement class quizzes.  The teachers also share some examples of how they use these websites and tools for learning activities. Here are the websites discussed in this podcast:





  • Quizlet.com
  • Quia.com
  • NewsELA.com



  • Tuesday, March 17, 2015

    Bloom's Taxonomy: Many Test Questions and Activities in Education are no Longer Useful

    Benjamin Bloom and associates (Anderson & Krathwohl, 2001; Bloom, Engelhart, Furst, Hill, & Krathwohl, 1956; Krathwohl, 2002) have developed a way to tell where learning activities would sit on a scale between simple (lower-order) and complex (higher-order). The result of this work has been coined Bloom’s Taxonomy. This post is an excerpt from my book, Educational Technology for Teachers

    Bloom’s Taxonomy is a hierarchical listing of the different kinds of learning outcomes that are possible in a given learning situation. In a revised version, the categories in Bloom’s Taxonomy from lower-order to higher-order are remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating and creating (Krathwohl, 2002). The categories in Bloom’s Taxonomy build upon one another. Students who understand something also must remember it. Students who evaluate something must be able to apply and analyze it. Learning experiences can be classified using the categories in Bloom's Taxonomy, and usually learning in the more complex categories (applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating) better meets learning needs for the Information Age. Take a look at the link below for a review of the categories in Bloom's Taxonomy.




    Remembering Remembering is the simplest category in Bloom's Taxonomy. Remembering means that students retrieve simple answers from their own memory (Krathwohl, 2002). An example of a remembering activity might be this question on a test; “how many Spartan soldiers defended ancient Greece in the battle of Thermopylae?” In this example, the students are only required to recall from memory the information they have learned.


    Understanding Understanding is the next lowest-order category in Bloom’s Taxonomy. Understanding means that students make sense of the items that they learn (Krathwohl, 2002). An activity on this level of Bloom’s Taxonomy might require students to write an essay that summarizes a chapter in the novel Hatchet. In this example, the students simply make sense of the subject matter, but they add little new knowledge to what was already in the novel. Other activities that would fit within this category include classifying items into groups, comparing different items and explaining phenomena.


    Applying The next category in Bloom’s Taxonomy is Applying. Applying goes beyond understanding because the student must carry out a procedure or activity according to a set of standards or steps they have learned (Anderson & Krathwohl, 2001; Krathwohl, 2002). An activity in this category requires students to take some action related to the subject matter. For instance, after having learned about the elements of the sentence, students could be asked to form a proper sentence from the elements that they have learned. This would require students to apply their knowledge of sentence structure.


    Analyzing Analyzing is more complex than applying. Analyzing means breaking something down into its parts, comparing these parts or determining how these parts add up to a whole (Krathwohl, 2002). Students are analyzing when they understand concepts and how the concepts are structured together. Analyzing means combining information and presenting it in a new format, or combining ideas into a new process or product. A good example of an analyzing activity is a research project in which students must make sense of different sources and combine and organize these together in a paper that presents a new idea based on the different sources.



    Evaluating Evaluating is the second highest category in Bloom's Taxonomy. Evaluating goes beyond analyzing because students must make judgments about the value of material using relevant criteria (Krathwohl, 2002). An evaluation activity might include checking or critiquing a work to determine its overall value. Preparing for and participating in a debate about a specific policy or issue would be considered evaluating. Another example of evaluating might include having students provide a recommendation for a technology purchase based on a given budget and priority list. These activities require students to make value judgments about policies or products.


    Creating The highest-order category in Bloom's Taxonomy is creating. Activities within the creating category require students to put elements together to make a product or project (Anderson & Krathwohl, 2001; Krathwohl, 2002). When creating, students draw upon their knowledge in many different areas to make a new product or project. Some examples of projects within the creating category might include students composing a song according to certain requirements, developing a website with specified elements or designing a brochure that meets the needs of a client.

    So what does Bloom's Taxonomy mean for education in the Information Age? An honest look at the state of affairs in our current society reminds us that many test questions and activities in the lower-order categories (remembering and understanding) are no longer useful. Consider the high amount of information currently available and the low amount of time that it takes to access this information. Providing students with opportunities to memorize information is not helpful to their future in the Information Age because almost anyone is already able to access this information within seconds. Teachers must create more learning experiences for students that are higher-order learning (applying, analyzing, evaluating and creating) to give students the skills they need to succeed. Learning methods that we have discussed so far, including student-centered learning, constructionism and project-based learning, tend to require learners to apply, analyze, evaluate and create — activities that would be considered higher-order learning.

    Thursday, March 12, 2015

    EdTech for SD Teachers Podcast - Episode 20: Teachers Present their Favorite Learning Management Apps and Websites

    This week, South Dakota Teachers share their favorite websites and apps that relate to learning management tools and systems. A learning management system allows you to post assignments and activities so that students can complete them and submit them online.  The teachers also share some examples of how they use these websites and tools for learning activities. Here are the websites and apps discussed in this podcast:






  • Edmodo
  • Google Classroom
  • BuzzMath.com
  • Google Presentations
  • MyBigCampus
  • Twitter - my Twitter feed



  • Thursday, March 5, 2015

    EdTech for SD Teachers Podcast - Episode 19: Grumpy Cat Barriers to SD Teachers Using New Ideas and Technology

    This week, Josh Jensen and I discuss some of the barriers to South Dakota teachers using new ideas and new technologies in the classrooms. We also talk about some nice sites for scheduling parent-teacher conferences and other meetings. Here are a few links from this episode:






    Tuesday, March 3, 2015

    Teachers share more tools: ReadWorks and Scholastic News

    As South Dakota teachers continue to share their favorite technology tools, I received some in video format. Since this format doesn't work too well for a podcast, I decided to include them on this blog post instead. First watch Mary teach about readworks.org, a great reading comprehension tool.



    Next, Allison shares about how she uses scholastic news in her classroom.



    Do you use any of these tools in your classroom? What has been your experience with them?